St Mary's Parish Magazine November 2026
I don’t know if the system still pertains but in the Dark Ages when I was a warden there was a vicar’s warden and a people’s warden, the one who represented the views of the vicar and the other who spoke on behalf of the people, so both sides had a voice and their views were represented. Had the objectors to the hall scheme been better represented perhaps things would have been different.
St. Mary’s church will soon (?) be under new management. Let’s hope that the clergy, parish officers, the various committees and members of the congregation will be kept fully informed of plans for the churches’ future be they large or small. And if something displeases you don’t be afraid to make your feelings known.
A final thought. The plan could have succeeded if a bold decision had been made to sell the church building and develop the hall as a modern worship and social centre. How much more attractive that would be than to worship in the current gloomy building. The naysayers told me that it couldn’t be done but England is bursting with churches which have been re-purposed. So, if someone wants Phoenix to rise from the ashes……..
Chris Seaman
I found Philippa’s article asking suggestions for naming our church bells interesting. May I suggest the following. As our church has six bells, could each be named after the six archbishops who had a connection to our church, five of whom are buried there: namely…
Charles Manners-Sutton John Bird Sumner Charles Thomas Longley William Howley Edward White Benson Archibald Campbell Tait, Their surnames could be used or perhaps, more informally, their Christian names with the two bells named Charles being Charles 1 and Charles 2. However, my favourite would be to use the shortened form of their Christian names:
Chas 1 John Chas 2 Tom Archie Bill and Eddy
Yes, I think that could catch on. How about it bellringers? Peter Bourne