Bi-weekly local newspaper
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS :::: CARIBBEAN AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH caribbeantimes.com
(BROOKLYN, New York): Grenada is celebrating yet another historic achieve- ment after capturing its 19th Gold Medal at the prestigious Chelsea Flower Show 2026 in London!
The Spice Isles once again showcased to the world stage our creativity, beauty, and floral excellence. Regarding MOVING GRENADA FORWARD after 19 years of winning gold: The branding is already done. We have the best flowers, interna- tionally.
According to organizers: Now it's time to monetize our reputation: more Grenadians should be growing more, selling more & exporting more. We have the soil, the ideal climate, and the beautiful species of flow- ering plants. Now let's please optimize, and capitalize our potential in the growing and monetization/commercialization of the art and science of the growing of flowers.
Continued from page 1 circumstances, while the standard route re- mains immigrant visa processing through the State Department abroad.
For Caribbean workers, students, nurses, and families already living on tight margins, this is not a theoretical change. It means a Jamaican caregiver, a Trinidadian student, or a Guyanese technician may now have to up- root themselves, travel back island-side, and wait while their U.S. case is finalized.
confusion between ordinary green card trav- el rules and the separate question of adjust- ment of status, which are not the same thing. In plain English: people already holding green cards should be careful about lengthy stays outside the U.S., while applicants still trying to get green cards may need to prepare for a more demanding, overseas process.
tion lawyers quoted in recent coverage say the memo recasts adjustment of status as an "extraordinary" benefit, not an entitlement, which gives immigration officers at overseas embassies more room to deny in-country fil- ings.
For immigrants from the Caribbean, the practical effect is anxiety and delay. For ex- ample, consular processing can involve doc- ument collection, embassy scheduling, med- ical exams, police certificates, and longer waits outside the U.S., all while jobs, leases, and children's school lives remain tied to America.
Still, the larger question is whether the Ca- ribbean diaspora will accept being treated as special risk class in a system that has long depended on its labor, tax contributions, and family stability. If this policy survives legal challenge, it could reshape how thousands of Caribbean migrants plan their futures in America. For now, the message is blunt: the road to a green card may be getting longer, costlier, and far less forgiving for Caribbean immigrants trying to turn temporary status into permanent belonging.
Caribbean immigrants are disproportion- ately affected because many have long relied on U.S.-based adjustment of status after law- ful entry, especially through employment, marriage, or family sponsorship. Long trips back home can trigger scrutiny for perma- nent residents, especially if travel stretches beyond roughly 180 days, which may raise questions about abandonment of residency.
That warning matters in a region where family emergencies, funerals, caregiving, and seasonal travel are part of everyday life. A policy that treats ordinary Caribbean travel patterns as suspicious can make lawful per- manent residents think twice before board- ing a plane home.
This is also a diaspora issue, not just an immigration issue. Caribbean communities in New York, Florida, New Jersey, and Texas depend on steady migration pipelines that support households here and back home through remittances, travel, and caregiving networks. When the pathway tightens, the burden falls hardest on families with the least flexibility the same people who have kept churches, small businesses, remittance flows, and community institutions alive for decades. That is why this policy feels less like a technical update and more like a warning shot.
The new USCIS policy does not repeal section 245(i) of the immigration law, but it can make 245(i) cases harder to win because officers are now told to treat adjustment of status as an exceptional discretionary bene- fit, not just a checklist application.
Section 245(i) is still important because it allows certain people who would otherwise be blocked by issues like unauthorized work or unlawful presence to adjust status in the United States if they were properly grand- fathered under the statute. In other words, 245(i) can still cure some old immigration
Immigrant households should pay close attention to where a case is being processed, whether any travel could complicate status, and whether a pending case now requires a different strategy. There is also the risk of What the official language means
USCIS's new position does not abolish green cards, but it does narrow the path to them by emphasizing discretion and consul- ar processing as the default route. Immigraproblems, but it does not remove the need for USCIS to approve the case as a matter of discretion.
The new memo shifts the focus from sim- ple eligibility to whether the applicant "de- serves" adjustment in the agency's view. That means a 245(i) applicant may still qualify un- der the law, but USCIS can now weigh nega- tive factors more aggressively, including past status violations, unauthorized employment, or failure to leave when expected. So the pol- icy does not erase 245(i); it raises the risk of denial at the final decision stage.
For Caribbean families and others relying on 245(i), this is the key problem: the statute may keep the door open, but the new poli- cy makes the hallway narrower. Applicants should expect more scrutiny, more requests for evidence, and a stronger need to docu- ment positive equities like family ties, tax compliance, community involvement, and steady employment. If the case can be han- dled through 245(i), that remains valuable, but it is no longer a shield against tougher discretionary review.
245(i) survives, but the new USCIS poli- cy makes it less forgiving. It does not cancel the statute; it makes approval less automatic and puts more pressure on the applicant to prove why USCIS should favorably exercise discretion.