Back
Flip
Vertical
Horizontal
All Pages
1 / 32
Mailing List
Share
Fullscreen
sa

MyangaAngusBullSaleCatalogue_2026_20260717

By sarvika

Go to stand
Share link
https://covver.com/magazine/sarvikaaaa-2/myangaangusbullsalecatalogue-2026-20260717-2
Published
Jul 27, 2026
Pages
32

More in this magazine

  • MyangaANGUS 25th SPRING BULL SALE
  • NutrienAg Solutions™ John Palmer: 0417 653 445
  • MyangaANGUS myanga.com.au 25th SPRING BULL SALE
  • WELCOMEWelcome to the 25th Myanga Angus Spring Bull Sale. Our foundation is built on three core principles: fertility, structural integrity and do cility. We are proud to present our 2026 bull draft for your consideration.
  • Page 5せ AuctionsPlus
  • SALE INFORMATIONINSPECTIONS Welcome any time by appointment or from 9.00am on sale day.
  • BEEF CLASS STRUCTURAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEMStructural problems in cattle have a substantial effect on both the reproductive and growth performance of a beef herd. It is widely recognised that structural problems in sires have detrimental effects on conception rates, calving patterns and thus profitability. Similarly, females with inadequate structural characteristics are more prone to weaning lighter calves or conceiving later in the breeding season than their more functional counterparts. These structural problems are filtered through the supply chain resulting in reduced income for the producer, feedlot and thus reducing the overall productivity of the Australian Beef Industry. Over the two decades, use of the Beef Class Structural Assessment System in the seedstock industry has produced a marked improvement in herds which have shown commitment to using the information appropriately. Through these dedicated breeders, there has been a flow on affect of structural improvement through out all sectors of the beef cattle industry. This structural analysis has allowed the formation of structural EBV's which are gaining momentum within the industry. Liam Cardile of 'BEEFXCEL' structurally assesses many of the leading seedstock herds in Australia. 'BEEFXCEL' is not involved in any genetic marketing or specific breeding advice and therefore has no conflict of interests to influence their stock appraisal. The integrity of the structural data provided by 'BEEFXCEL' is recognised throughout the industry as Liam is a fully INDEPENDENT assessor. 'MYANGA' STRUCTURAL PROGRAM:
  • MYANGATABLE 2026 BULL SALE - QUICK EBV
  • Page 9$359 +0.88 +0.94 +1.34 $181 $362 +0.86 +0.82 +0.72 $244 $378 +1.30 +1.20 +0.92 $239 $417 +0.82 +0.94 +0.78 $166 $291 $A $A-L +1.06 +0.92 $275 $392
  • MYA24V163MYANGA TOPGUN V163PV Traits Observed: BWT,Scan (EMA, Rib,Rump,IMF),Genomics
  • MYA24V208MYANGA TOPGUN V208PV Traits Observed: BWT,Scan (EMA,Rib,Rump, IMF),Genomics
  • MYA24V141 HBRAMFU,CAFU,DDFU,NH2% MYANGA TOPGUN V141PV
  • MYA24V240Lot 10 MYANGA SOUTHERN CROSS V240SV
  • MYA24V146MYANGA TOPGUN V146PV Traits Observed: BWT,Scan (EMA, Rib,Rump,IMF),Genomics
  • LOT 4LOT 8 LOT 13
  • Page 1614 LOT 19
  • MYA24V168 HBRAMFU,CAFU,DDFU,NHFU MYANGA RIGHT TIME V168PV
  • MYA25W19 HBRAMFU,CAFU,DDFU,NHFU MYANGA PICASSO W19PV
  • MYA25W2 HBRLot 22 MYANGA HART W2PV
  • MYA25W32 HBRLot 25 MYANGA WINCHESTER W32SV
  • MYA25W85 HBRMYANGA HART W85SV Lot 28
  • MYA24V254 HBRAMFU,CAFU,DDFU,NHFU MYANGA TOPGUN V254PV
  • MYA24V155MYANGA COMSTOCK V155PV Lot 34
  • MYA24V243MYANGA DESIGNER V243PV Traits Observed: BWT, Scan (EMA, Rib,Rump,IMF), Genomics
  • Understanding the TransTasmanAngus Cattle Evaluation (TACE) What is the TransTasman Angus Cattle Evaluation?
  • Page 26CEDir UNDERSTANDING ESTIMATED BREEDING VALUES (EBVS)
  • Page 27$D $D-L
  • Page 28Recommendations for the introduction and management of your new bull: 1. UPON ARRIVAL:
  • Page 294. POST-JOINING: a. Annual breeding soundness evaluation is a non-negotiable procedure. b. Good management of bulls is a year-round procedure.
  • Page 30NOTES 28
  • DIRECTIONS TO MYANGAMyanga ANGUS myanga.com.au 480 Chapmans Lane
  • MyangaANGUS Stephen Dunne
Text of this page

CEDir

UNDERSTANDING ESTIMATED BREEDING VALUES (EBVS)

Higher EBVS indicate fewer

Genetic differences in the ability of a sire's calves to be born unassisted from 2 year old heifers. calving difficulties in 2 year old heifers.

Calving Ease/Birth

CEDtrs days

Genetic differences in the ability of a sire's daughters to calve unassisted at 2 years of age.

Higher EBVs indicate fewer calving difficulties in 2 year old heifers. Genetic differences between animals in the length of time from the date of conception to the Lower EBVs indicate shorter birth of the calf. gestation length. Lower EBVS indicate lighter birth weight.

Genetic differences between animals in live weight at 200 days of age due to genetics for Higher EBVS indicate heavier growth.

  • BW kg
  • 200 Day kg
  • Growth
  • 400 Day kg
  • 600 Day kg
  • MCH cm
  • Maternal
  • MBC score
  • MCW kg
  • Milk kg

Genetic differences between animals in calf weight at birth.

Genetic differences between animals in live weight at 400 days of age.

Genetic differences between animals in live weight at 600 days of age.

Genetic differences between animals in the height of mature females.

Genetic differences between animals in the body condition of mature females.

Genetic differences between animals in live weight of cows at 5 years of age.

  • live weight.
  • Higher EBVS indicate heavier live weight.
  • Higher EBVs indicate heavier live weight.
  • Higher EBVS indicate taller mature females.

Higher EBVS indicate more body condition of mature females.

Higher EBVS indicate heavier mature weight.

Genetic differences between animals in live weight at 200 days of age due to the maternal Higher EBVS indicate heavier contribution of its dam. live weight.

Genetic differences between animals in the time from the start of the joining period (i.e. when the Lower EBVs indicate shorter female is introduced to a bull) until subsequent calving. time to calving.

  • Fertility
  • DtC days
  • SS cm
  • CWT kg

Genetic differences between animals in scrotal circumference at 400 days of age.

Higher EBVs indicate larger scrotal circumference. Higher EBVS indicate heavier carcase weight.

Genetic differences between animals in hot standard carcase weight at 750 days of age. Genetic differences between animals in eye muscle area at the 12/13th rib site in a 400 kg Higher EBVs indicate larger cm²

  • EMA carcase.
  • Carcase
  • Rib Fat mm
  • P8 Fat mm

RBY do IMF

Genetic differences between animals in fat depth at the 12/13th rib site in a 400 kg carcase.

Genetic differences between animals in fat depth at the P8 rump site in a 400 kg carcase.

  • eye muscle area.
  • Higher EBVs indicate more fat.
  • Higher EBVs indicate more fat.
  • Higher EBVs indicate higher yield.

Genetic differences between animals in boned out saleable meat from a 400 kg carcase. Genetic differences between animals in intramuscular fat (marbling) at the 12/13th rib site in Higher EBVs indicate more a 400 kg carcase. intramuscular fat.

Genetic differences between animals in feed intake at a standard weight and rate of weight Lower EBVS indicate more gain when animals are in a feedlot finishing phase.

  • Feed/Temp.
  • NFI-F kg/day
  • Doc
  • Claw Set score
  • Structure
  • Foot score
  • Angle Leg Angle score
  • Selection Index
  • Genetic differences between animals in temperament.

Genetic differences in claw set structure (shape and evenness of claws).

Genetic differences in foot angle (strength of pastern, depth of heel).

Genetic differences in rear leg structure when viewed from the side (angle at front of the hock).

Genetic differences between animals in net profitability per cow joined in a typical commercial self replacing herd using Angus bulls. This selection index is not specific to a particular market end-point, but identifies animals that will improve overall net profitability in the majority of commercial, self replacing, grass and grain finishing beef production systems.

The $A-L index is similar to the $A index but is modelled on a production system where feed is surplus to requirements for the majority of the year, or the cost of supplying additional feed when animal feed requirements increase is low.

While the $A aims to maintain mature cow weight, the $A-L does not aim to limit the increase in mature cow weight as there is minimal cost incurred if the feed maintenance requirements of the female breeding herd increase as a result of selection decisions.

feed efficiency.

Higher EBVS indicate better temperament.

Lower EBVs indicate less curl of the claw set.

Lower EBVS indicate more heel depth.

Lower EBVs indicate a less angular leg angle.

Higher selection indexes indicate greater profitability.

Higher selection indexes indicate greater profitability.